In recent years, graffiti street artists have become international names. I am intrigued, and admittedly unfamiliar with the graffiti / street art scene. I am familiar with names like Shephard Fairey and Banksy, who have had international success. I find the dichotomy between “street cred” versus mainstream success very interesting, especially in a culture such as graffiti art. Can the two coexist? Why do many claim Banksy’s pieces as art while a graffiti painting down the street from me goes unnoticed and is regarded as vandalism? Why is one acceptable over the other? What is the true relationship between society and graffiti, between order and chaos? Why do cities spend so much money restoring Banksy pieces that were mistakenly painted over during a restoration project to remove graffiti?
The more I think about it, the more I find the exceptions made for Banksy annoying. This is probably why I find this story insightful and a little bit satisfying.
This happened late in 2009, but I just read about it recently. Robbo, is known and recognized as a pioneer in the British graffiti scene. In fact, this piece has stood in Camden for more than 20 years as recognition of that fact.

That is, until Banksy painted over it.

Robbo, returns the favor and paints over the Banksy original. The first of many to come.

A good old fashion graffiti war. Check out these video and blogs to learn more about the Banksy vs Robbo war and the London street art scene in general.
http://www.babelgum.com/streetartlondon